Next.js vs Framer: The Strategic Choice That Saves You $20K
Stop wasting money on the wrong platform. Here's exactly when Next.js makes sense, when Framer wins, and when you need both.
Rashid Iqbal
@rashidiqbalNext.js vs Framer: The Strategic Choice That Saves You $20K
Choosing the wrong platform can cost you $20,000+ in wasted development time.
Building a marketing site in Next.js? Your marketing team will be stuck waiting on developers to change headlines. Building a web app in Framer? You'll hit a wall when you need user authentication.
Let me show you exactly when to use each—so you don't make expensive mistakes.
The 30-Second Decision Framework
| Question | Next.js | Framer |
|---|---|---|
| Does it need user auth? | ✅ | ❌ |
| Will marketing update content? | ❌ | ✅ |
| Is it a web application? | ✅ | ❌ |
| Need to launch this week? | ❌ | ✅ |
| Processing payments? | ✅ | 🟡 |
| Complex data visualization? | ✅ | ❌ |
| Portfolio/agency site? | 🟡 | ✅ |
| Blog with custom features? | ✅ | 🟡 |
Still confused? Here's the simple rule:
If users log in → Next.js. If marketing owns it → Framer.
When Next.js Is the Only Choice
1. Web Applications with User Data
The moment users need to:
- Create accounts
- Store personal data
- Process payments
- Access dashboards
You need Next.js. Full stop.
// Next.js API Routes: Full backend power
// app/api/users/route.ts
export async function POST(request: Request) {
const { email, password } = await request.json();
// Hash password, store in database, send verification email
const user = await prisma.user.create({
data: {
email,
password: await hash(password, 12),
}
});
await sendVerificationEmail(user);
return Response.json({ success: true });
}
Framer cannot do this. It's not designed to.
2. SEO-Critical Content Sites
If organic search is your primary traffic source, Next.js gives you:
// Dynamic metadata for SEO
export async function generateMetadata({ params }) {
const product = await getProduct(params.slug);
return {
title: product.name,
description: product.description,
openGraph: {
images: [product.image],
},
// Full control over everything
};
}
// Static generation for speed
export async function generateStaticParams() {
const products = await getAllProducts();
return products.map(p => ({ slug: p.slug }));
}
3. Custom Business Logic
Imagine you need a calculator that:
- Pulls real-time currency rates
- Applies tiered pricing rules
- Generates PDF quotes
- Sends data to a CRM
// This is trivial in Next.js
export async function calculateQuote(formData: FormData) {
const rates = await fetchCurrencyRates();
const pricing = applyTieredPricing(formData, rates);
const pdf = await generatePDF(pricing);
await sendToCRM(pricing);
return { pricing, pdfUrl: pdf.url };
}
In Framer? Impossible without external services stitched together with duct tape.
When Framer Wins (And It Often Does)
1. Marketing Sites That Marketing Owns
This is Framer's superpower:
- CMO wants to test a new headline? Done in 2 minutes.
- Designer wants to tweak spacing? No developer needed.
- A/B test landing pages? Built-in.
- Launch a campaign page this afternoon? Easy.
The ROI calculation is simple:
Without Framer: Marketing request → Dev ticket → Sprint planning → Development → Review → Deploy = 2-3 weeks
With Framer: Marketing request → Marketing does it → Done = 2 hours
Over a year, this saves 100+ developer hours.
2. Design-Forward Portfolios & Agency Sites
Framer was born from design tools. It shows:
- Micro-interactions without code
- Scroll-based animations (native)
- Responsive design with visual controls
- Components with variants
- Real-time collaboration
// What takes 50 lines of Framer Motion code
// is literally drag-and-drop in Framer
3. Speed to Market
When you need a professional site in days, not weeks:
Framer timeline:
- Day 1: Design directly in Framer
- Day 2: Add interactions, connect CMS
- Day 3: Launch
Next.js timeline:
- Day 1: Project setup, design to code
- Day 2-4: Build components
- Day 5: Connect CMS
- Day 6-7: Testing, deployment
The 3-day Framer site isn't worse—it's often better designed because designers built it directly.
The Hybrid Architecture (My Secret Weapon)
Here's what smart companies do:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ YOUR DOMAIN │
├────────────────────┬────────────────────────────┤
│ www.domain.com │ app.domain.com │
│ │ │
│ FRAMER │ NEXT.JS │
│ - Marketing site │ - Dashboard │
│ - Landing pages │ - User authentication │
│ - Blog (maybe) │ - API routes │
│ - Pricing page │ - Data processing │
│ │ │
│ Marketing owns │ Engineering owns │
└────────────────────┴────────────────────────────┘
Why this works:
- Marketing moves fast (Framer)
- Engineering builds solid (Next.js)
- Neither team blocks the other
- Each tool does what it's best at
Cost Reality Check
Let's do the math for a typical startup:
Option A: Everything in Next.js
- Development: 160 hours × $150/hr = $24,000
- Hosting: $20/month
- Content updates: Need developer = $2,000/month
- Year 1 total: ~$48,000
Option B: Everything in Framer
- Development: 40 hours × $150/hr = $6,000
- Hosting: $30/month (Pro plan)
- Content updates: Marketing does it = $0
- Year 1 total: ~$6,400
- But: Can't build user dashboard. Need to add that separately.
Option C: Hybrid (My Recommendation)
- Framer marketing: 20 hours = $3,000
- Next.js app: 80 hours = $12,000
- Hosting: $50/month total
- Content updates: $0
- Year 1 total: ~$15,600
- Best of both worlds
Migration Considerations
Moving from Framer to Next.js
When it makes sense:
- You've outgrown Framer's capabilities
- Need custom functionality
- SEO requirements are complex
Effort level: Medium. Export content, rebuild components.
Moving from Next.js to Framer
When it makes sense:
- You realize marketing needs control
- Developer resources are limited
- Site is simpler than originally scoped
Effort level: Low-Medium. Visual rebuild, content migration.
My Decision Checklist
Before every project, I ask:
-
Who will update content?
- Marketing → Framer
- Developers → Either works
-
What's the timeline?
- < 2 weeks → Framer
- 2+ weeks → Either works
-
What features are needed?
- Auth/payments/data → Next.js
- Content/marketing → Framer
-
What's the budget?
- < $10K → Framer (unless app needed)
- $10K+ → Match to requirements
-
What's the 2-year roadmap?
- Scaling to app → Start with Next.js
- Staying marketing-focused → Framer
The Bottom Line
Framer is a design tool that happens to publish websites.
Next.js is a development framework that happens to be great for websites.
They solve different problems. Using Framer for a web app is like using Figma to build software. Using Next.js for a marketing site is like hiring a construction crew to hang a picture.
Match the tool to the job.
Need help deciding? Check out my web development packages →
P.S. I use both tools weekly. I love both. But I love shipping the right solution even more.